Incomprehensible logic
September 26, 2006 Y created X.
Y thinks that he/she is responsible with X.
Z validated what was done by Y regarding X is correct.
W said that something is wrong with X.
Y thought that W is blaming him/her.
W thinks that he/she simply stated a fact.
W asked V if what he/she has said is perfectly fine.
V answered yes.
W now firmly believes that he/she is correct and that
he/she doesn't owe anyone an apology.
Previous Comments
All comments are moderated. Your comments will not appear here unless approved by the blog owner. Thank you.


A social one. Aims at the stars. Conservative with money - usually. Broad in ideas. Ideals applied to home. Aggressive socially. With high aspirations, sometimes too high! Loves freedom. Big-hearted, benevolent in attitude. Persistent and practical in work. Sometimes sportive. Loves children. Aspires onward......




For the sake of X (which is between them), Y and W should talk alone. They should not involve any letter of the alphabet coz having too many variables will make things more complicated.
Posted by anonymous at September 26, 2006, 1:39 pm